I TOLD YOU SO IN 2001

I visited on Sunday with outgoing Park View School Principal Anne Brooks
and then spent some time with the OLDEST Boy Scout Troop, #970, in
Claude Moore Park for their Court of Honor. BSA Troop 970 at Sterling
Methodist is now in its 35th year and awarded 11 Eagle Scouts this year.

Now for some more "old news", but still fresh after all these years.

DELGAUDIO SANG "I TOLD YOU SO"

Last month, the Supreme Court threw out the downzoning of Loudoun County
in a unanimous decision. 7 Justices of the Virginia Supreme Court threw
out the zoning ordinances for the "rural area" passed by the previous
no-growth (YEAR 2000-2004) Board of Supervisors.

DELGAUDIO PREDICTED SUPREME COURT DECISION 4 YEARS AGO

In comments on the record and before the Board of Supervisors on July
23, 2001, I predicted the plan would not be upheld by the Courts and
ultimately, 4 years later, the court cited "no public hearing after
amendment" as one of the reasons.

I cited three reasons which still hold today and are still relevant:

On July 23, 2001, I said the following:

(quote)"The plan proposed to us by the Planning Commission has been
revised in work sessions of the BOS over the past few weeks and will not
go to the public for comment before it is passed into law. That is one
of the reasons I will vote against it. There have been cross outs and
dozens of amendments. And I think the final version should go to public
comment.

Second, I will vote against the Plan because most of the future
newcomers will be located in Eastern Loudoun and all housing here will
become even more coveted and higher priced.

Third, I will vote against The Plan beause the Board of Supervisors'
Chairman and a majority of Board members have routinely presented a
false premise about the reasons for downzoning in the West and upzoning
in the East. (unquote)

There was ample legal authority that supported me back then. I cited it
then and I frequently cite it. The majority of supervisors ignored it 4
years ago and often a majority of the current board ignore it now.

WHO ARE THESE AUTHORITIES DELGAUDIO?

MIKE FARRIS "$100 Million PENALTY JUST THE BEGINNING"

On July 16, 2001, legal scholar Mike Farris gave testimony to the
previous Board of Supervisors that still is true today about the
previous Board's downzoning:

(QUOTE) "A takings lawsuit will not just cost taxpayers of this county a
few million dollars in attorney's fees. It will not just be about
throwing the new zoning rules out. Damages will be sought in
extraordinary amounts with a realistic chance of success........

the cost of losing (in litigation from downzoning), and this is a very
realistic alternative, is utterly staggering. I think that $100 million
dollars will not begin to satisfy the potential judgement that could
well be imposed......" (UNQUOTE)

DELEGATE RICHARD BLACK WARNED OF DENSITY PACKING

Delegate Black testified on December 12, 2000 to the Planning
Commission, and I quoted him on Jan. 2, 2001, days later, at the Board
of Supervisors:

"I submit that if you asked residents in eastern Loudoun if they
supported the County's plan to increase density in eastern Loudoun by
70-350 per cent you wouldn't find a single supporter...."

LAST WEDNESDAY NIGHT "DOWNZONE NIGHT 2005"?

The Board last week, at a worksession on June 1, voted to downzone
"western" Loudoun for a 2nd time, but a new board doing it.

CLEM ALOWS BOTH PLANS TO GO TO PUBLIC HEARING

The Republican majority of six members went down to 4 at one point (a
minority) and then back up to five "after a break."

Quoting a local paper: "But after the break, Supervisor Stephen J. Snow
(R-Dulles) called for both proposals to be sent forward to the board's
June 21 meeting for formal debate. That motion passed with five votes,
including (Jim) Clem's."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/01/AR2005060101872.html?referrer=email

Headline from the Leesburg Today website:

Two...Plans Advanced; Clem Holds Swing Vote.....

http://www.leesburg2day.com/current.cfm?catid=21&newsid=10711

>>>SCHOOL BOARD COMMITTEE ABANDONS PRO-FAMILY SIDE
AND MAKES LIBERALS HAPPY?

Please read a verbatim published account from a local newspaper. It is
all the bad news that I told you about. The action by the School Board
committee, 5 to 0, is a major defeat for pro-family forces in Loudoun
County. Under the heading of respecting "free speech", anti-Christian
propaganda will now be forced upon crowds of innocent people routinely
in Loudoun schools. With five School board votes voting this way, it
does not look good for pro-family forces in Loudoun.

Mark Nuzzaco, Robert DuPree, Bob Ohneiser, Thomas Reed, Joseph Guzman.
All members of the Legislative Policy Committee, voted for a "Make
Liberals Happy Policy".

These are direct quotes from the published source. The next meeting of
the School Board is Tuesday June 14 (yes, primary day) at 6:30 p.m. A
motercade of pro-family cars is meeting at 6 p.m. at the local Food Lion
to go to the meeting. They will demand that a policy that prevents
pro-homosexual anti-Christian propaganda from happening again to be passed.

Right now, read and weep:

(QUOTE from local newspaper, May 29)
School Panel Agrees on Plays Policy
Full Board to Vote on Rules for Student Drama

A committee of the Loudoun County School Board voted Wednesday to
recommend a policy that would ban obscenity in school plays and require
that student drama take account of community sensibilities. The policy,
however, would not directly mention sexuality.

The policy endorsed in a 5 to 0 vote by the board's legislative policy
committee now goes before the full nine-member board, where it could
still be revised.

(SUPERINTENDENT HATRICK HAPPY)

The proposed policy on school plays relies heavily on wording suggested
by School Superintendent Edgar B. Hatrick III.

The board has been wrestling with a policy on student theater
productions since the Stone Bridge High School drama club performed
"Offsides," a one-act play written by a student, in February. In the
play, a popular football player is rejected by friends after revealing
homosexual impulses. The show contained a scene in which two boys
approached one another as if to kiss before the stage lights went dark.

"Offsides" sparked anger from some parents and other community members
who said it was inappropriate for high school, but it was defended by
others who felt that students were exercising free speech.

(PRO-FAMILY LANGUAGE DROPPED)

Committee members spent 3 1/2 hours painstakingly examining the policy
word by word Wednesday. Members proposed banning plays that "depict
sexual acts" or "contain sexual themes." Committee Chairman Mark J.
Nuzzaco (Catoctin) proposed forbidding content that is "obscene, lewd,
lascivious, profane, slanderous or libelous." Each of those motions was
defeated.

Instead, the policy to be considered by the full board relies heavily on
wording proposed by Superintendent Edgar B. Hatrick III. It says that
plays should "challenge, nurture and extend student skills while
adhering to the basic educational mission of teaching students
boundaries of socially appropriate behavior, the rights and
responsibilities of the exercise of free speech and the importance of
taking into consideration the sensibilities of the community." It also
says that "theatrical presentations involving obscenity shall not be
permitted."

(GUIDELINES WOULD ALLOW PRO-HOMOSEXUAL PLAYS)

Hatrick would be directed to issue guidelines to principals about how
best to implement the policy. He said he was still working on such
guidelines, but a sample he provided would instruct principals and drama
teachers to consider whether a play was "appropriate to the emotional
maturity of the target audience." The guidelines would also prohibit
plays depicting "vulgar or lewd acts." Principals would have the option
to convene an advisory committee but would make the final decision about
whether a play should be allowed.

(REED CHAMPIONS FREE SPEECH FOR LIBERALS)

Thomas E. "Tom" Reed (At Large) voted against several motions to make
the policy more far reaching, explaining that he was using the play "The
Diary of Anne Frank" as his standard. The play deals with challenging
subject matter that would be appropriate for high school students but
perhaps not for younger children, Reed said. But he said he was
unwilling to vote for any policy that could be interpreted as barring
the classic work.

School Board members turned frequently to lawyer William Chapman for
advice and said they would ask him to review the language again before a
final vote.

(GEURIN DISAPPOINTED)

J. Warren Geurin (Sterling), who is not a member of the committee and
was not eligible to propose amendments, told fellow board members that
he did not think that what they had done was "enough of a prohibition."
He had recommended a policy that would bar plays that "contain sexual
themes, promote sexuality or depict sexual acts."

(SAY STRAIGHTFORWARD WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED)

"I don't quite understand why we look at this backwards," he said. "Just
say straightforward what is not allowed."

But community members on both sides of the debate said they were
reasonably satisfied.

Chris Stevenson, who is working with a group of residents called the
Community Levee Association of Loudoun County, called the committee's
policy a "good first step." The group, which he said is made up of a
core of seven or eight parents but has an e-mail list of about 100, had
put forward a policy that would have referenced the county's family life
curriculum, which teaches that students should realize "the importance
of postponing sexual relations until marriage."

Stevenson said the association had not yet taken an official stance on
the committee's policy, but he said the policy was "moving in the right
direction."

(MAINSTREAM LOUDOUN AND "TRANSGENDERED" LOBBY SATISFIED, ISN'T THAT
SPECIAL?)

Jeri McGiverin, president of Mainstream Loudoun, which pushes for the
separation of church and state, also said she was mostly supportive of
the policy, as did David Weintraub, president of the gay rights
organization Equality Loudoun.

Both sides said they planned to make suggestions before the full board
votes. No date has been set for a vote, but the board could begin debate
as soon as its next meeting June 14.
(unquote from published source)

Other Interesting News Items

Battle Of The Bands Ends With Flames (Just Posted)

http://www.leesburg2day.com/current.cfm?catid=6&newsid=10725

Loudoun Lands Another Bond Upgrade; Fitch Goes AAA

http://www.leesburg2day.com/current.cfm?catid=28&newsid=10724

Big Liberal Shows Western Loudoun Empty of People

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/27/AR2005052701772.html

Top Women in Loudoun, DAVID DINGMAN GROVER DAY, Write the School Board
http://joineugene.com/news/article.php?article=673

19 People In One House
http://joineugene.com/news/article.php?article=672